{"id":243,"date":"2023-04-24T09:39:45","date_gmt":"2023-04-24T09:39:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/?page_id=243"},"modified":"2023-05-02T14:13:08","modified_gmt":"2023-05-02T14:13:08","slug":"bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n\t

BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting<\/strong><\/h2>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY At this stage, maybe this week or two, they're less likely to be digging in and chasing those people because they\u2019re making a start. So from our feedback from us as a housing association, we've had a guy from the HSE come round to us. He wanted to have a look on site, he wanted to see a few things. Two things really, firstly to see where we were and how we were moving, and also I believe for them to gauge how well what they\u2019re doing was being received. They were sending things out, but did we did we understand it. And part of the process, why we said to them, yeah, come along talk to us was because we knew that if we were engaging with them and showing them how far we've come and what we were doing and how proactive we were, they were less likely to hassle us in the future. Because basically they go, we\u2019re making friends, we're not in any conflict with you. We\u2019re doing well, they\u2019ll go great. Yeah, as you say, you've got a few things in folders already, you\u2019re making works happening on site.<\/p>\n

We\u2019re changing cladding, we've done one building we\u2019re moving on to a next, it\u2019s happening. And if I was the HSE I'd go THCH, don\u2019t need to worry about them, they\u2019ve got it in hand, let\u2019s concentrate our efforts on those that are going, no, you don't need to do this, or I'll do it next year or we haven't got the budget. They're the people they're gonna hassle. So in one sense, yeah, those people who are making an effort they\u2019re not going to be hassling. They\u2019re going are you on track, are you doing what you\u2019re expected to do. Good, move on, we\u2019ll concentrate on other people. However, at the same time, while we're doing stuff, one of my colleagues in a different housing association had produced quite a good safety case. They've gone right through to actually producing a safety cases and had sent them in three or four times, and a bit like the old fashioned planning process, in the same sort of way, but building safety. You send something in, they tell you it's wrong, won't tell you how to fix it, but just tell you it's wrong, might give you some guidance into which direction it is and send it back, and then they'd make those changes and then they'd send it in again and then they go, no, that's still not quite what we meant. And then send them out and then send them in again.<\/p>\n

So on one side of things, you've got, yeah, you're doing fine, and on the other side of things they were going, no, that\u2019s not good enough, that\u2019s not good enough, because they wouldn\u2019t give guidance. You ask these people to come and say can you tell us how to do it, they\u2019re not going to tell us, they\u2019re going to say you come up with the design, it has to be suitable for your building, we\u2019ll tell you what\u2019s wrong with it but we won\u2019t necessarily tell you how to do it. And yes they are after\u2026t the same time they want people vaguely in the right direction, but when you\u2019re doing the final delivery they are expecting\u2026and, of course, they\u2019re learning. So, I\u2019m sure what\u2019s happening is stuff is coming in from one housing association and they go, oh, there\u2019s 10 things on there that we never thought about those. And then someone else will send something else in and they\u2019ll go, oh, look at what this bloke has talked about, we never thought about that, we\u2019d better tell these people to do it too. That goes back, and meanwhile there\u2019s more information coming in and they're picking the best of them all and going, oh no, you haven\u2019t done this. So, until we all learn from each other there\u2019s always going to be something better to be done.<\/p>\n

But, the biggest thing is BIM, I think it\u2019s because people use the word digital, basically everything is digital nowadays. All the digital means now is not on paper. That\u2019s all they mean is just don\u2019t send me pieces of paper. The only places you\u2019re going to get pieces of paper is in your SIB box on site, apart from that it\u2019s digital. So, digital could just mean a pile of PDFs, in theory. So, when you're talking about info to the fire brigade, for the Fire Safety Act, for instance, they just want PDF\u2019s, because literally they're gonna be reading them on the screen as if it's a piece of paper. So, that's them done. Whereas the building safety case, it depends on the building, doesn't it? And some buildings will need more formal complication. And if you can deliver it in a way that's clear and understandable, and we have a requirement to make it easily to be understandable and in theory we should be able to share this with residents to say, look, this is how you're building works, and it's understandable to them without too much detail.<\/p>\n

The front picture of it should be nice and clear and easy, but the HSE will go prove that bit, prove that bit, and that's where the underlying information needs to be explained in detail to prove why you've got that headline thing that we are safe because. And they say, well, tell us about the because and well, we're doing this, well, how do you know that's right? And where is it and who's got the qualifications and who\u2019s said that, yeah, that fire stopping device is actually in the right wall. It's no good having a lovely device if the wall\u2019s no good or if it's not suitable for the wall or there's holes round it. Who signed that off, and is it right. And that\u2019s where your detail comes in. And I think they don\u2019t want to restrict anyone\u2019s method, so they won\u2019t say you must do it this way, because someone will go but I\u2019ve got this brilliant idea, and you\u2019re telling me I can\u2019t use it! Because they want to allow us to come up with our own ideas that work for us.<\/p>\n

CHRIS HALL I think when you\u2019re doing new build a lot of it will be, bearing in mind there\u2019s layer upon layer of information. If you\u2019re building from scratch the method, and you remember this, George, we had about interoperability. In other words, from a manufacturers point of view we don\u2019t want to have to produce data in many, many different formats for many, many different people. We want to be able to have a piece of data that can be used my many users. I think to some degree the storage and recording of the building safety case and the golden thread will be dictated by the contractors and how they require you to present them with the information that they deem is necessary. And BIM is going to be a good way of doing that. I have to say a lot of the emphasis in the building safety regulator from housing associations and builders owners perspectives with have you registered your buildings. You have until such and such time to do them, are they all registered, do you know how to do it, this is how you do it. They ran 3 or 4 separate workshops on how to register the building and what information you have to log with the building safety regulator. Which is not really anything to do with BIM as such, it\u2019s the overview.<\/p>\n

But I think you\u2019re probably right, Andrew, there are those at the moment who will take their manila folder full of papers, put them through the scanner, and send them off and, hey presto, they\u2019re digital. But in the medium to long term, that ain\u2019t gonna wash. They\u2019re beginning to get systems thinking now as well, thinking about how things work in conjunction with other products. Because for example, you made a point there, a cavity barrier might only work or have certification in particular type of wall. So you have to put the product into its context, or a set the hinges in a fire door, or door handles and all of that stuff. And that's quite complicated and complex to work out, and that's what I think BIM has got a significant part to play. But I think that it wouldn't be the world's worst idea, George, to maybe have asked if the HSC would kind of give us their view on where BIM sits with them. I think they might just say, well, digital is digital, but they must have an opinion, there must have a view.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Well, the view I\u2019ve heard so far is legally it doesn\u2019t have to be BIM. It can be scanned in plans if that\u2019s as simple as the building is. But as it gets more complicated then BIM will be needed because of the complication.<\/p>\n

CHRIS HALL And the data storage requirements, and the size of the data and the size of the data banks and where the hell are you going to keep all of this stuff, bearing in mind, going forward, it\u2019s a significant amount of data.<\/p>\n

GEORGE And you need to be able to keep it up-to-date.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY We\u2019ve got a great classic which is as we are re-cladding our buildings we\u2019re using Multivista to o around taking photographs of the deconstruction of the wall, the reconstruction of the wall, across multiple points across the whole building as we take those walls off and on again. And in fact, there's probably more photographs than a new build cause we're taking photographs of it coming off and going back on again, whereas a new build would only go back on. That\u2019s a photograph per week per window, maybe, or an area around a wall. So, the number of photographs, the number of data points, the data of who, what, where and when was fitted on that small area of wall is huge. We\u2019ve got a window, a reveal, a cavity barrier, a bit insulation, the membrane behind the insulation, the other cavity barrier, the horizontal barrier, the vertical barrier. That's all within 1 foot of a bloody window, never mind that multiplied across the whole building. And then that has to be stuffed somewhere, but most of it we will never need. It will be there and we will need it at some point, and we need to have all of it.<\/p>\n

But what it will do is it will mean that in the future, in five years time, when I have to review the building safety case, I don't have to physically remove that wall to see what was behind it. I might need to do a random number, just as a spec\u2026but generally I can go through the photographs saying look, here it is being installed, here it is that the cavity, there is the make and model of the cavity barrier. But it's a huge amount of data, but it means, physically I won't need to find out later.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Just picking up on what Chris was saying earlier, the term BIM is a challenging one because it\u2019s something that people can relate to because it\u2019s a thing, but it also gets misinterpreted by people. That\u2019s one of the reasons we\u2019ve renamed the UK BIM Alliance Nima, we\u2019re trying to move it away from a 3D model to being about information. One of the challenges we\u2019ve got, and your example of Multivista is a really good one, is you\u2019ve done that for a particular exercise, so you\u2019ve got that as a data set that\u2019s accessible, so you could say that\u2019s one golden thread. If you have fire door inspections whoever is doing the inspection might be using PlanRadar, Bolster, Vision, there\u2019s a range of different applications they\u2019ll use. So therefore you will get a link to PlanRadar, you\u2019ll have somebody else that\u2019s maybe looking at smoke ventilation or dampers, they\u2019ll use something else.<\/p>\n

So, what that means is that although in theory you\u2019ve got a golden thread for each of those things it doesn\u2019t relate back to the same part of the building and therefore if then a change takes place because you do some renovation work and you update the drawings and the floor plan etc, all of a sudden all that additional information, where was the original fire stopping, where\u2019s the new fire stopping, it\u2019s all in different data sets. So, what we as Active Plan have been trying to do is make it so that that can be glued together so you can actually see it in context. Now, that\u2019s something that we\u2019ve\u2026we deal with hospitals and that type of federation, is something that I think is needed, and when I talk to people they agree. You still want your fire door inspector to be able to use the applications that they are familiar with, but it\u2019s a matter of what then happens with that data.<\/p>\n

We\u2019re doing something at the moment with a council and we\u2019ve been given access to Oakleaf which did the fire risk assessment. It\u2019s quite a comprehensive fire risk assessment, but how do you tie back the information about the various different things they\u2019ve put in that fire risk assessment against the building? My view is for the building safety process I think it does need to be glued together, so you can say, as Chris was saying earlier, you\u2019ve got a number of different asset types that need to work together to actually deliver the mitigation, or whatever the HSE, and that was the brief that we had when we started.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY It\u2019s a very good point, George, and I hadn\u2019t quite seen it in that way that actually there\u2019s this thing about putting information in one place, it\u2019s that golden thread single version of truth. But actually to enable that, you\u2019re quite right, there is sometimes a lot of data coming in inwards, and we\u2019re thinking so far I thought, yeah, the data comes in, it goes into one database, probably into another, and then goes into Multivista to record where it is. But when we\u2019re talking about updating data it needs to go back out, doesn\u2019t it? Because you\u2019ll end up with what appears to be a contradiction. You\u2019ll have data from one worker who said I\u2019ve changed this bit, and you\u2019ve got data from somewhere else who said when I was there I saw that. And you need to make sure that the dates are in there, so you know who was the most up-to-date.<\/p>\n

And in my experience, sometimes you get one person who has very recently been there, but has made an assumption. Whereas there is older data, so although it\u2019s older it\u2019s not necessarily less relevant. If it\u2019s older it might have been, but I was the man who installed it, I know exactly what date it was installed. More recently someone comes along and says, well, I\u2019ve had a look at it and i reckon it was installed on this date. But actually the person who actually installed it knows the actual date and the actual product. The person who\u2019s done the inspection is making an assumption or a guess. So, which is right, and then which one takes precedent, and then does it feedback into the other databases that says this information is now actually more up-to-date, you need to record it here, because otherwise at some point you\u2019re gonna someone saying it\u2019s blue, no it\u2019s red, no it\u2019s blue, no it\u2019s red, as different information comes in if you don\u2019t feed it back out again saying, no, we\u2019ve changed that, it\u2019s not like that anymore, we\u2019ve got rid of it. FRA stuff, the bloke does the inspection and quite quickly maybe someone is out there fixing it, it\u2019s changed, there\u2019s a new bit of kit there. And how do we make sure all of them are right, which is why they want the single point of truth, but equally does that feedback outwards to the other databases so that they\u2019ve got that information for the next round.<\/p>\n

GEORGE The approach that we\u2019re taking with that, we\u2019ve got a couple of different elements to it. I was given an example yesterday by somebody that\u2019s doing fire engineering, he said a common problem is that the fire strategy plans and the fire compartmentation plans may not relate to the fire zoning for the fire alarm because they've been done at different times by different people. He said that\u2019s not at all uncommon, and he said when we go and update the fire alarms or reconfigure, because obviously the fire alarms also need to reflect the use of the building as well. You can very easily end up with those being out of step with each other, because they\u2019re different documents.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yeah, and they can be for different reasons. We had exactly that, our office is quite open plan and we asked someone else to check the fire alarm panel and zone it, and he said, well, according to this it\u2019s all one big zone, it\u2019s all called Zone 1. There\u2019s zoning as in how many circuits there are, how many detectors are on one circuit going out and back again, which may or may not be the divided by a compartmentation line. Because mainly zoning is so that the fire brigade can go, oh, it\u2019s on the left of the building, the right of the building, upstairs, downstairs or in that cupboard, they just need to know location. And, of course, it\u2019s historic based on when we used to have, the zones was the only location thing you\u2019d have. But now we have individually addressed items on the fire panel, so in some ways zoning is less relevant because you can tell exactly where it is. So, zones are just a very vague it\u2019s over there. But you\u2019re right, they should really be along compartmentation lines. For instance, we\u2019ve got a set of plans where Zone 1 will be the left of the building and it will be 5 flats, obviously that\u2019s many compartments on many flats. It\u2019s just breaking the building up and it doesn\u2019t really reflect the compartmentation lines at all.<\/p>\n

GEORGE The approach we\u2019ve taken with that is that when you bring a spatial model, because we\u2019re working with Multivista, Andrew, by the way. We\u2019ve got a project at the moment where they\u2019re just completing the first part of it with Origin Housing. They\u2019ve scanned 5 buildings, and we\u2019ve also been doing the same exercise with Murphy Surveys, Plowman Craven and Spatial Dimensions as well, to try and break it up so that we can get some degree of understanding of how different people operate it. They\u2019re capturing the photographs, they\u2019re cutting through and producing the floor plans for us, so we\u2019ve got a 2D floor plan, but the important thing is that we\u2019re tying back to that 2D floor plan 360 photos. Now, the 360 photos, when they come into Active Plan, you can then use the data libraries to tag them with the things that you can see. So, it means you can build up an asset list from the photography. You can do it in 2 ways. One is if you know that there\u2019s an AOV in that area you can click on it and say that\u2019s where the AOV is. But you can also, for example, if there\u2019s a cavity barrier there you won\u2019t be able to see the cavity barrier (probably) but you can click on the photograph and identify that\u2019s where it is.<\/p>\n

The point about that is those 360 photographs can be taken just using \u00a3300 Ricoh cameras, so it means that the local team can get those cameras and use them to go and update the information so you can then have, maybe, annually you could have a new 360 photo. Or you do it when anything changes, that\u2019s probably the easiest way. So, that becomes part of a workflow that then keeps everything up-to-date and we can then take the fire zoning and fire compartmentation information and that then becomes part of the active plans so that you can then see that in context. So, that\u2019s where I\u2019m going with this, to be able to hold all the documents i a proper structured meta-database folder structure, and be able to tie, for example, the fire risk assessment back to both the building, and also break out of that, if there's a fire risk assessment against a particular flat then it's tied back to that particular grouping of spaces that\u2019s the flat. And also to be able to interactively make those changes. I\u2019m just trying to get a sense check to see if that\u2019s really what people want and need or whether we\u2019re just going over the top.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY I think you\u2019re right. Overall somehow we need a digital version of what\u2019s on site. How do we record what\u2019s actually on site, but more importantly how do we know that they do stay in sync. It\u2019s no good saying, well, the computer says it doesn\u2019t exist, when someone is standing there going, look, it\u2019s here in my hand. There was a cartoon on the wall of the wholesalers, the customer is standing there pointing, and the salesman on the computer was saying \u2018it\u2019s no good pointing at it, my computer says we haven\u2019t got one\u2019. We don\u2019t want that, it does need to be kept up-to-date. Which is right is quite tricky sometimes, because you\u2019ve got someone guessing because it\u2019s a survey and someone who installed it who\u2019s got it right. Someone does a repair and for some reason that repair process doesn\u2019t get through the system onto Active Plan or whatever, and update that data, because it gets missed. And then according to us the last time someone touched it was 6 years ago, well, that\u2019s not true, the bloke was down here last week.<\/p>\n

How do you make sure everything\u2026so for me it will be talking to repairs and their subcontractors and their subcontractors and saying, look, somehow we need to know about everything going on everywhere. And not getting irrelevant stuff coming through, we painted the wall in someone\u2019s flat, well, we don\u2019t need to know about that, but if you paint the wall in the stairwell I do want to now about it, because what was the product. But it\u2019s a very good point about it going out to other data. So the data it comes in from should be corrected and maybe sent out in several directions. Or it just ends up in one place, it\u2019s quite tricky because you\u2019ve got people using their bespoke stuff.<\/p>\n

GEORGE The proposition from my perspective is because Active Plan is a cloud data and it works off SQL servers, so it can talk to anything, we retain all of those individual files, but we federate them, so it becomes grouped together. And because we also use BIM 360 as part of our solution. If it's a 3D model then we can tie that together as well. So I think we've got a solution to that particular issue.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Well most of them do, don\u2019t they? Multivista and someone like yourselves where you\u2019ve always got that history, so you just go back and back. You can see all versions of it, but you try and see the current version. For simplicity you see the current version, but for historic data you can go back and see what it used to be. And the photos that go with it, which is useful.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Yeah, but each of these applications is designed for its particular purpose. For example, Multivista, being able to track back every week through your things is fantastic, but if somebody is just looking to find out what that asset is in that room, they want a much simpler way of doing that.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yeah, they don\u2019t need to know what it used to be because it's gone. That's irrelevant now, they just want to know what it is now.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Exactly. And also to be able to tie it back to the information about how it was inspected and who did it etc. So, my approach is to see if we can use that in a federated way. Now, obviously feeding stuff back out again is an important area. So, if for example a floor plan changes, it\u2019s a matter of then identifying an alert to whatever the application is, maybe the fire stopping, that there\u2019s a revised floor plan. Bolster, they, like most people, work off a PDF. In theory, that\u2019s great, but the PDF is just an image, so the pins that are on the PDF, the work that we\u2019re looking to do is to make it so we can pick up the coordinates of those pins and then se bring them back into the spatial model so that you can see not just where the penetration seal pins are, but you can also see where information that might have come in from Plan Radar is as well. So, all of the different locational information can then be federated so you\u2019ve got (for want of a better term) a digital twin that\u2019s reflecting that.<\/p>\n

I\u2019d be interested in having a session with you to talk through what we\u2019re doing in that regard to see if there is perhaps an opportunity with Tower Hamlets. I don\u2019t mean this in the sales way, but you\u2019re experience on that would be\u2026you\u2019ve obviously spent a lot of time thinking about this and working through it and I\u2019d be interested to see if you think we\u2019re on the right track. We\u2019re doing the thing at the moment with Tower Hamlets? 33mins 23secs Homes, there\u2019s been delays in kicking that off because they wanted to get their Type 4 fire risk assessments done, literally this week the surveyors are going in and doing the point clouds on 3 of the blocks and capturing the 360 photos, so I can show you what we\u2019re doing there. Have you got all your stuff in the premises information boxes now?<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yeah, mainly, although adding some of the newer stuff going into the premises information boxes like sort of an elevation view or a floor-by-floor view. All the floor plans have been done, but putting things like residents with PEEPs and things like that. Regarding HRRBs, depending how you count them, we\u2019re doing them as 11 blocks. And those 11 blocks, on occasion, are 2 or 2 buildings, but they are a building. So, if you drew the circumference around the block it\u2019s sometimes 4 named stairwells, if you like. But actually if you look at it from a building point of view it\u2019s one building with 4 stairwells in it, so we\u2019ve called that one. But when we list addresses it\u2019s about 17, or something. We\u2019ve got a couple of joint buildings of 2 or 3 or 4. Not huge, a nice manageable number of interesting blocks, some of them are just concrete and brick tower blocks, so relatively straightforward, and then you have to worry about the more recently built 15 year old buildings that are the terrible ones. The really old buildings are fine, they\u2019re just brick and concrete and we\u2019ve got nice new fire doors in them, most of it is passive not active, whereas the new buildings are all over the place.<\/p>\n

GEORGE So, you\u2019re using Multivista, what other software are you using?<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY The consultant we\u2019re using is Altair, and Altair have worked with Multivista a lot and also one of their staff is effectively embedded in us as a project manager, that\u2019s Laurie Stroud, he\u2019s been running one of the cladding replacement programmes. So we got Multivista effectively taking the overall stuff and photos and they\u2019re doing internal photos, plotting it and the data in the background. We as an organisation are trying to go to Asset Pro internally for all assets, nothing to do with fire safety really, just about when the kitchen and bathroom are due next. That\u2019s sort of asset replacement for general repairs and maintenance. We\u2019re doing our own door surveys and we\u2019ve got Turner & Townsend doing our FRAs. The idea is all that information will partly feed into Asset Pro and then we\u2019ll feed out of that into the BIM modelling again, possibly, or directly or both at the same time. Within Multivista they use CADline, they\u2019re very good at the scanning and modelling and the plans and data.<\/p>\n

GEORGE So, the other thing obviously from a construction point of view, one of the things that that came out from our working groups the other day, let me just show you this, change control. As a landlord, this might not effect you too much.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Well. it might do, because my development team (which is one person), she came to me and said we might be either planning what we build next, or we might be buying in a building, and I said, well, it depends what stage it\u2019s at as to how much\u2026we might be getting new stuff in, or partly built.<\/p>\n

GEORGE (shares screen). This was given to us by one of the team members from Bouygues. This slide was produced by the NHBC, but it was their interpretation from lots of conversations with the regulator, so this is what they\u2019re expecting to come out in the secondary legislation, I think. One of the important things here is when there is a major change, the principal that they\u2019re trying to work to here is that the decision for all of these critical assets, like smoke dampers, smoke ventilation and fire doors, and the things that impact on compartmentation. Those decisions have got to be taken before construction starts, which is a massive change.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yes, exactly, because when Tina, our development manager, said can I feed into some information for her, and also I\u2019m doing a building safety managers degree course with the CIOB, Diploma course, and it sort of came up as one of the questions. The decision making, yes, has to be done much earlier, one because it needs to, and two it makes sense because the argument is where things have gone wrong in the past compromises have to have been made because certain things can't be reversed, once you've gone past a certain point. It\u2019s very hard to say that's the wrong wall you've built all the way up the building, can you change it? It\u2019s the wrong type of wall, I can\u2019t put my kit in that, so I tell you what, I\u2019ll put this bit of kit in, which isn\u2019t exactly what you need, but that\u2019s the best I can do, and you get all these compromises. Whereas if you did it at the very beginning, can you build it with this wall instead of that wall because it will then suit my products, then happy days.<\/p>\n

And it doesn\u2019t really cost anymore when you build it, which type of wall you put in. So, doing everything a lot earlier, in theory, in the planning stage is the biggest thing. And you should have less need for change control if everyone is in the room at the beginning. Then, when someone says we\u2019re gonna save a couple of quid, we\u2019re gonna change this for that, and everyone goes no! Don\u2019t do that because effects this, that and the other. Whereas what's happened in the past is someone's changed it and then the blokes been told to turn up to do his thing and he goes, what the heck is this? This is not what I thought I was gonna walk into.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Absolutely. And the difficulty with that is contractor design portion, which is the way the M&E tends to be procured, is\u2026that's the challenge really.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY At my previous role at Estuary Housing we were building quite a lot of buildings and I was coming along when they were about 3\/4 done and having a look at it, and so many times what the heck\u2019s this! Well, my mate said he needed it. Why? Who\u2019s the designer? What is this, why is it there? Why does it contradict that? You\u2019ve got a sign there saying \u2018stay put\u2019 and you\u2019ve got an alarm saying \u2018leave\u2019. The ERs from the employers requirements said you needed a fire alarm so we fitted one. Yeah, but who\u2019s the designer? Well, you are, because you said you needed a fire alarm. Well, we didn't actually say we need a fire alarm, we said you need to put in whatever needed. But we've put it in because you asked for it. Well, we didn't really ask for it. Who's the designer? And nobody knows, but someone\u2019s put it in because someone said that someone said that they needed it. What a mess.<\/p>\n

And I think the biggest thing on that for us all is the competency side of things. Who\u2019s competent, who\u2019s the right person, have they got the qualifications, experience and knowledge to design it and put it in. At the end of a meeting, who is saying, yes, we all agree. I\u2019ve had meetings with fire alarm people to ask them what they want, and they\u2019re sort of saying, well, it depends what you want. And at the end you end up going, well, am I allowed to do it, is it the best way? Well, you can if you want, but we\u2019ll have to sign this bit of paper. Again it\u2019s like who is the designer here? Please, someone's gonna sign at the bottom line saying they're responsible for it.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Well, that\u2019s really the pint that Paul McSoley\u2019s been making, that one of the challenges is that the designers that are selecting products, they need to be properly informed by all of the complexity of the different things that could impact on whether that damper is going to work. And it\u2019s very complicated, there\u2019s a whole decision tree that needs to be built up for each of the asset types. The frustration I\u2019ve got is that the subject matter experts are saying that that\u2019s what needs to be done, because otherwise that damper just won\u2019t work properly when it\u2019s called upon. But I\u2019m not seeing any appetite in the industry for who\u2019s going to do that. We\u2019ve been doing this for the last three years pro bono to get that knowledge brought together, but the challenge that we\u2019ve got is then how do we then get that implemented. If people are dropping back to just give me a certificate and transfer the risk. Who would they accountable person be for your buildings? Would that be a director within Tower Hamlets?<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Accountable persons don\u2019t have to be a person. Legally, person just means entity. It also means it allows for change, so if you have your staff changing you don\u2019t have to keep telling everyone that peoples changed, or even job titles. So, technically, Tower Hamlets Community Housing is the accountable person. However, the accountable person would in practice be our CEO, because you can\u2019t take a company to court but you can take the CEO who\u2019s responsible for this. And then within the accountable person they are required to delegate down (because if they don\u2019t delegate down, it\u2019s them), so they delegate it down to people like me and my directors around me to make sure they get the job done. And in fact I had that thought process a year ago now when my health & safety advisor was rewriting the health and safety policy. I said you know what we need to put in there now is about responsibilities which says, so that CEOs are realising what they\u2019re signing up to do, because I\u2019ve had this.<\/p>\n

A CEO decides one day they don\u2019t need a building safety manager, and then can get Fred to do that instead. They\u2019ve done it with other jobs, oh, we don\u2019t need you, I\u2019ll give it to them. What they haven\u2019t realised is that that person had delegated legal responsibility that if it all went wrong he\u2019d be the bloke in court, and they sack him. One of the arguments I\u2019ve had about the difference between a named building safety manager and the building safety manager being a corporate client idea. If the people above don\u2019t realise they\u2019ve got rid of that person who was gonna carry the can, then it will come back up to them. And if they have no technical knowledge, they are in the wrong place. They shouldn't even be trying to do it because they don't have it either, and it's about that competency thing. So it's very important that within an organisation that although you name THCH as the overall that the delegation down is to a named person, because you need to have someone who is responsible further down, so you can have a responsible person and an accountable person.<\/p>\n

GEORGE I was told the term responsible person had sort of been removed.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY There\u2019s two. I had an email about where one of my colleagues in another organisation has some of their properties in our properties, they sort of sublet, and I have to answer them for the same question. What we\u2019ve got is accountable person under the building safety act, but responsible person under the fire safety order. But they\u2019re actually the same person, under the legislation they\u2019ve got different names. Where we sublet half a building out we\u2019ll be the principal accountable person, and the housing association that\u2019s taken half our flats, they\u2019ll be one of the accountable people. The one that\u2019s rally dropped out is the building safety manager. The role still needs to be done, but the job title doesn\u2019t have to be building safety manager.<\/p>\n

GEORGE So, if they accountable person is delegated down to you, responsibility for that and therefore, legally, you could end up, if things go badly wrong, being held responsible. If that\u2019s the case, let\u2019s say for example you move on or move roles or whatever, the person that\u2019s coming in to take on that role would be taking on that legal responsibility also.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yeah, and then in practice, I\u2019ve got a team\u2026I had a manager, so there\u2019s me, my manager who was in charge of fire safety capital works, head of department, so there\u2019s me, a department head above me, and then our director for property services. And then at the same time we\u2019re employing Altair. So I\u2019d say between us all we\u2019ve got responsibly to making sure that it all happens. Now, legally if someone challenged where the buck actually stops, I\u2019d try and push it back up to Anna, my director, overall and the board perhaps, and then legally they\u2019d probably push ti down to me saying but you\u2019re the technical person who advises us. And I\u2019d say, well, I\u2019m getting advice from my own knowledge, but also from Altair, and as much as possible we all sort of sit in the room and go is everyone happy with this, because that\u2019s the only way top do it. No one person is an expert on this. As you said, it\u2019s a bit like Paul saying about putting the right damper in the right wall, it\u2019s not about one decision, it\u2019s that bigger picture.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Well, actually, the accountability that the government was trying to achieve with this is probably not really there.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY No, because they\u2019ve decided that\u2026I think the reason they took the role of building safety manager out and it got pushed out was because you\u2019re going to get some tiny organisations who don\u2019t need to employ a person called a building safety manager. It\u2019s like my Fred who\u2019s the head of property services, he\u2019s fine being the building safety manager within his role. I think they should have kept it and called it a role, not necessarily a job title. And in other larger organisations, L&Q for instance, they\u2019re gonna have building safety manager over there, and they may have a different role. So, they may have equivalent to deputy building safety managers, whereas they are upskilled caretakers, for instance, they look after those buildings, they keep and eye on what\u2019s happening in their building, and then you have senior building safety managers who look after a group, and then probably a head of building safety manager who looks after everything in total. And then of course it becomes a whole team of building safety managers, systems, and in other ones it\u2019s a 1\/4 or a person, so i suppose why they say that\u2019s why we can\u2019t give it one name because it\u2019s horses for courses on the size of buildings.<\/p>\n

GEORGE The thing is, it\u2019s a matter really of drawing everything together and making it simple to navigate, the updating processes and things like that are really vital.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yeah, and for me that\u2019s why it\u2019s important that I\u2019m in my role because (don\u2019t tell anyone) but I don\u2019t do a lot. i don\u2019t really have a budget, I do, but I spend other people\u2019s budgets. But I don\u2019t get given this is your project, I do have lots of projects, my projects are mainly communications and gathering stuff. But the biggest project I\u2019ve got is that overview, I\u2019m not head-in-the-sand working on a project so much that I don\u2019t know everything else that\u2019s going on. So, one minute I\u2019m talking to the FRA guys about has that broken window got fixed or whatever, all those hundreds and hundreds of FRA items, and at the same time I\u2019m talking to the plan guys who are rebuilding a building. But, I\u2019m the only one in our organisation that knows about all of it, because one thing effects something else. Someone's going we\u2019re just going to do that, woah! No, no, no, don\u2019t you realise if you change that it\u2019s going to bugger up this.<\/p>\n

GEORGE Asbestos is a classic example of that, often the only people that know that are the people that know the building quite well.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Yeah, that\u2019s a good point. Someone goes, oh, we\u2019ll take that bit of asbestos out, but if it\u2019s doing a fire safety job, and someone goes I\u2019ll put a bit of plywood in, no! For maintenance and general day-to-day repairs we use Axis Europe.<\/p>\n

GEORGE And they presumably use their own software to capture that and then feed it back into Asset Pro.<\/p>\n

ANDREW HOLLEY Mostly at the moment we raise orders on our system which get sent to Axis, they then come in and it closes the job off. And we pretty much in our own system say that job\u2019s done. And we can dig in a bit if we want to check that it was properly done, not just closed as not done. Or they went to d a) and they actually did b) instead. That\u2019s one of our bits that I\u2019m getting from our repairs system and\/or Axis\u2019 info and feeding it properly into Asset Pro, so that you do get the results of jobs done properly fed back in, not just what we asked for. Sometimes what you ask for and what you get\u2026because sometimes you don\u2019t know, the tenant phones up and says I\u2019ve got a leak, that\u2019s all you know, until they\u2019ve done the job you won\u2019t know what to record. So, getting the feedback in is quite important. But I think the biggest thing overall, because I\u2019ve had to learn it, that thing Paul said about dampers, completely new to me. I think I said at the meeting, I thought I knew quite a lot, and actually I know nothing. I\u2019m doing it at that level, but people who have very little connection with that have to have a much better understanding of before you change things you need to understand how it might affect the building. Your biggest thing is your building as a system, and changing components within that whole system can mess up the system.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the overall thing, the building is not seen as bunch of components, which it used to be, the fire alarms the fire alarms, the doors are the doors, and you don\u2019t need to talk about the 2 together. As you said today about fire alarm panel zoning and compartment zoning. Someone did a clip the other day, it was a bloke saying \u2018have you got this problem?\u2019, trying to pull a door open because the suction from the AOV was sucking the door shut. I\u2019ve just had a quote in for the ground floor front door of a block to go from opening inwards to opening outwards. It\u2019s about the number of people going outwards, but also it\u2019s about security, you can\u2019t bash a door in that opens outwards, you have to pull it, which makes it more secure. But, if that door is almost designed to open to suck air in to allow the air to go up and out and it\u2019s now going to open outwards, it\u2019s going to be sucked shut and it won\u2019t open to allow the air up and in. How is the air going to come into the building if it\u2019s not going to come through a blowing open front door. Building as a system, change one thing it changes something else.<\/p>\n

Under the new Gateway idea it should go back to the original designer and say that front door, was it built to open inwards to allow the AOV to work? And if it does and we change it to outwards, does it affect the AOV? Or, is it immaterial, because there\u2019s a vent somewhere else that actually does that job and the front door is irrelevant? But that\u2019s the change process you\u2019ve just shown up which would happen as we go through Gateways. Someone says we\u2019re gonna do this because the bloke from Secure By Design reckons you\u2019ll have a more secure door if you open it outwards, but the AOV bloke goes no, that\u2019s my air inlet valve effectively. If you don\u2019t want to have the door opening inwards we\u2019re going to have to knock a huge hole in the wall here to let the air in some other route. And you don\u2019t want to wait until there is a real fire to find out, oh, that\u2019s why it opens inwards. But yeah, I\u2019m finding out things are far more interlinked that you might know. And of course other staff, who are not as involved, haven\u2019t even got it on their radar that it might affect something else.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting ANDREW HOLLEY At this stage, maybe this week or two, they’re less likely to be digging in and chasing those people because they\u2019re making a start. So from our feedback from us as a housing association, we’ve had a guy from the HSE come round to us. He wanted to…<\/p>\n

Read More<\/span>+<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-243","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nBIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting - BIM4Housing Construction<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting - BIM4Housing Construction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting ANDREW HOLLEY At this stage, maybe this week or two, they're less likely to be digging in and chasing those people because they\u2019re making a start. So from our feedback from us as a housing association, we've had a guy from the HSE come round to us. He wanted to…Read More+\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"BIM4Housing Construction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-02T14:13:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"35 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\\\/\",\"name\":\"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting - BIM4Housing Construction\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-24T09:39:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-02T14:13:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/\",\"name\":\"BIM4Housing Construction\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bim4housing.com\\\/construction\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting - BIM4Housing Construction","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting - BIM4Housing Construction","og_description":"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting ANDREW HOLLEY At this stage, maybe this week or two, they're less likely to be digging in and chasing those people because they\u2019re making a start. So from our feedback from us as a housing association, we've had a guy from the HSE come round to us. He wanted to…Read More+","og_url":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/","og_site_name":"BIM4Housing Construction","article_modified_time":"2023-05-02T14:13:08+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"35 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/","url":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/","name":"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting - BIM4Housing Construction","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-04-24T09:39:45+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-02T14:13:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/bim4housing-construction-working-group-meeting-29-03-2023\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"BIM4Housing Construction Working Group Meeting"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/#website","url":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/","name":"BIM4Housing Construction","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/243\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":256,"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/243\/revisions\/256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bim4housing.com\/construction\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}